Driving and hypoglycaemia: beliefs, behaviours and awareness — ASN Events

Driving and hypoglycaemia: beliefs, behaviours and awareness (#116)

Melba Mensch 1 , Mary Ho 1 , Tuan Quach 2
  1. GNC Diabetes Service , Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
  2. Department of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, NSW, Australia

The aim of the audit was to identify the driving behaviour and hypoglycaemic management of 72 patients on intensive insulin therapy in 2010 and 2011.
Method: Patients completed a cross-sectional questionnaire prior to their attendance at a self-management course .This included a validated question to assess the presence of hypo unawareness(1) and 5 non-validated questions examining patients’ understanding and self-management of hypoglycaemia including driving behaviour .
Of the 72 respondents 37.5% were female with an average age of 48.3 years and an average duration of diabetes of 15.6 years, and 62.5% male with average age of 49.8 years and an average duration of diabetes of 12.3 years
Results: Hypoglycaemia Unawareness- ten (13.9 %) of the subjects were hypoglycaemia unaware, 60 (83.3%) had acceptable level of hypglycaemia awareness and two (2.8%) stated they had never had a hypo.
Hypoglycaemia Beliefs
1.”Below what blood glucose level would you define a hypo?”

320-Melba%20talbe.jpg
2 “At what blood glucose level do you feel the first sign of a hypo?” the average BGL threshold was 3.5 mmol/L ( Range <2 - 5 mmol/L).
3. “When testing your blood, have you ever had a BGL result less than 4 mmol/L and you haven’t had any hypo symptoms? “: 29 (40%) stated yes.
4, “Do you carry food/drink to treat hypos with you?”: Always 28 (38.9%), Most of the time 19(26.4%,) Sometimes 11 (15.3%) Never 2(2.8%), omitted answer 12 (16.6%)
Driving behaviour - 27 (37.5%) reported that they never tested their blood glucose levels (BGL) before driving as compared to 6 (8.3%) who always tested, 13 (18%) who tested most of the time, 20 (27.8%) tested some times and 6 (8.3% ) who don’t drive.
Conclusions: A number of patients demonstrated inadequate appreciation of hypoglycaemia,poor understanding of hypoglycaemia treatment and risky driving behaviours.