The performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD- EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas for estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) in Indigenous Australians with and without diabetes (#16)
Background: The CKD-EPI formula has been proposed as a more accurate marker of GFR than the MDRD formula. However, the best method for estimating GFR in Indigenous Australians with diabetes is still unclear.
Aims: To analyse the performance of CKD-EPI and MDRD formulas for estimating GFR (eGFR) in Indigenous Australians with or without diabetes.
Methods: Participants were Indigenous Australians with (n= 234) or without (n=345) type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A reference GFR measurement was obtained using the plasma disappearance of iohexol (mGFR) over 4 hours. Serum creatinine was measured by an enzymatic method. Performance was determined as bias (absolute difference), derived from mGFR-eGFR and accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 30% of mean mGFR).
Results: In the entire study population, the performance of the CKD-EPI formula was superior to the MDRD formula. However, in Indigenous Australians with diabetes, the CKD-EPI formula underestimated mGFR to a greater extent (p < 0.05) and was less accurate (p < 0.05) than in those without diabetes (Table).
Conclusion: In Indigenous Australians with diabetes, the CKD-EPI formula has a greater negative bias and is less accurate compared to those without diabetes. Nevertheless, the CKD-EPI equation outperforms the MDRD equation in all Indigenous Australians and remains the preferred equation to estimate GFR in this high risk population.